flirt4free review

“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage

“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage


The current research examined the recognized impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationships? (2) just how do the individuals feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) Just how can the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that almost all the individuals had been affected by the social stress placed upon them. Furthermore, the individuals recognized the previous generation as “racist”. Nevertheless, interestingly you can find signs and symptoms of a generational mindset change. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 percent for the individuals would not desire to interfere inside their children’s partner selection. The residual 20 per cent had been against interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages.

That is a preview of registration content, access via your organization.

Access choices

Purchase solitary article

Access immediately to your full article PDF.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Donate to journal

Immediate on the web access to all or any dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.


It ought to be noted that relationship is generally maybe perhaps not appropriate into the Arab and community that is muslim others) unless the couple’s intention will be date solely (but, specific limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate activities) along with the make an effort to get hitched. Furthermore, in some instances, the approval regarding the female’s daddy ( or any other significant male figure) is needed seriously to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter ended up being addressed throughout the assortment of the information so that you can respect individuals’ social traditions and spiritual observing.


Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial discussion: Uncertainty, understanding, and also the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social therapy (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test for the contact theory among majority and minority teams in three europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.

Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin males dating Jewish women. nana10. Retrieved 31, 2013, from december.

Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing identities that are mixed the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing information that is qualitative Thematic analysis and rule development. Ny, NY: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and household connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous types of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.

Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on gender in addition to social context of love and closeness. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.

Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence system participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.

Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Indication, 26, 415–440.

Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.

Felmlee, D. (2003). Discussion in social support systems. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Ny: Plenum.

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking features using the passage through of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.

Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of battle for starting a partnership. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.

Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the selection of wedding mates. American Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Factors, patterns, styles. Yearly Review of Sociology, 395–421.

Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains on a Code of Honor: The marginalization that is murderous of in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.

Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect and also the development of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.

Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to develop and implementation. London: Wiley.

Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a tiny university campus. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites therefore the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Communication Analysis, 10, 55–79.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies as well as the growth of romantic relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Research, 10(1), 55–79.

Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship dedication. personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social networking sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens associated with the social networking. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.

Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and ways of qualitative meeting studies. New York: The Complimentary Press.

Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort education that is promoting. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. Marriage and Family Review.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not absolutely all love affairs are supposed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in a conflict-ridden area. Center East Journal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *